π Strategic Monthly Review β March 25 to April 25
π’ Who Advanced β Strategic Wins
These actors achieved their goals by moving early and shaping alliances:
- πΊπΈ United States: Expanded tech decoupling and secured allied production.
 Result: Increased NATO/Quad industrial coordination.
- π¨π³ China: Strengthened ASEAN trade corridors and yuan settlements.
 Result: Regional backing for its alternative systems.
- π ASEAN Bloc: Formed cyber-fintech pacts while staying neutral.
 Result: Became a global supply chain magnet.
π΄ Who Struggled β Missed Moves
These actors lagged due to internal drift or reactive posture:
- πͺπΊ European Union: Launched CBAM, but internal fragmentation delayed impact.
 Risk: Strategic dependency continues.
- π·πΊ Russia: Tried energy leverage via military expansion.
 Result: Undermined by global energy diversification.
- π―π΅ π°π· Japan/Korea: Aligned with U.S. defense but lacked proactive vision.
 Result: Dependent, not decisive.
π§ Dashboard Verdict
- Strategic Drivers: USA, China, ASEAN
- Strategic Followers: Japan, Korea
- Strategic Laggards: EU, Russia
π Insight: Clarity + Speed = Advantage. Delay = Decline.

 
							 
  
  
  
  
  
		 
		 
		 
		 
		 
		 
		 
		 
		