Sharing is Caring! Thanks!

Below are examples applying the “Cui Bono” assessment for each leadership category, complete with hypothetical scenarios, identified actors, motivations, and benefit scores.

1. Business Leadership

Scenario: A company decides to automate its manufacturing process.

Identified Actors:

  • Shareholders
  • Employees
  • Customers
  • Management

Motivations:

  • Shareholders: Increased profits due to lower labor costs.
  • Employees: Job loss or job reassignment.
  • Customers: Potential lower prices due to cost savings.
  • Management: Streamlined operations and improved efficiency.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Shareholders: 5 (high benefit)
  • Employees:1 (low benefit)
  • Customers: 4 (moderate benefit)
  • Management: 4 (moderate benefit)

2. Career Leadership

Scenario: An individual seeks additional certification for career advancement.

Identified Actors:

  • The Individual
  • Employer
  • Colleagues
  • Certification Body

Motivations:

  • The Individual: Improved skills and career prospects.
  • Employer: More skilled workforce; potential employee retention.
  • Colleagues: Possible increased competition for promotions.
  • Certification Body: Financial gain from course fees.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • The Individual: 5 (high benefit)
  • Employer:4 (moderate benefit)
  • Colleagues:2 (low benefit)
  • Certification Body:5 (high benefit)

3. AI Leadership

Scenario: A tech company releases an AI-driven analytics tool.

Identified Actors:

  • Developers
  • Clients using the tool
  • Competitors
  • Regulators

Motivations:

  • Developers: Career advancement and financial gain.
  • Clients: Improved decision-making and efficiency.
  • Competitors: Need to adapt or lose market share.
  • Regulators: Ensuring compliance with standards.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Developers: 5 (high benefit)
  • Clients:4 (high benefit)
  • Competitors:2 (low benefit)
  • Regulators:3 (moderate benefit)

4. Innovation Leadership

Scenario: A startup develops a groundbreaking renewable energy technology.

Identified Actors:

  • Investors
  • Consumers
  • Competitors in the energy market
  • Environmental NGOs

Motivations:

  • Investors: Return on investment from a successful product.
  • Consumers: Access to cleaner energy and potential cost savings.
  • Competitors: Increased pressure to innovate.
  • Environmental NGOs: Achievement of sustainability goals.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Investors: 4 (high benefit)
  • Consumers:5 (high benefit)
  • Competitors:2 (low benefit)
  • Environmental NGOs:4 (high benefit)

5. Political Leadership

Scenario: A government proposes new tax incentives for electric vehicles.

Identified Actors:

  • Auto manufacturers
  • Consumers
  • Environmental activists
  • Taxpayers

Motivations:

  • Auto manufacturers: Increased sales of electric vehicles.
  • Consumers: Financial benefits from tax incentives.
  • Environmental activists: Reduced carbon emissions.
  • Taxpayers: Concerns about government spending and priorities.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Auto manufacturers:5 (high benefit)
  • Consumers: 4 (high benefit)
  • Environmental activists: 5 (high benefit)
  • Taxpayers:2 (low benefit)

6. Health Care Leadership

Scenario: A hospital implements a new electronic health records (EHR) system.

Identified Actors:

  • Patients
  • Healthcare providers
  • Insurance companies
  • EHR vendors

Motivations:

  • Patients: Improved access to their medical records.
  • Healthcare providers: Enhanced efficiency and better patient care.
  • Insurance companies: Streamlined claims processing.
  • EHR vendors: Profit from software sales and ongoing support.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Patients: 4 (high benefit)
  • Healthcare providers:5 (high benefit)
  • Insurance companies: 4 (high benefit)
  • EHR vendors: 5 (high benefit)

7. Sustainability Leadership

Scenario: A corporation commits to a zero-waste policy.

Identified Actors:

  • Company Executives
  • Employees
  • Local Community
  • Shareholders

Motivations:

  • Company Executives: Enhancing corporate image and leadership.
  • Employees: Job security and morale from sustainable practices.
  • Local Community: Environmental benefits and potential job creation.
  • Shareholders: Concerns about potential costs associated with sustainability.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Company Executives: 5 (high benefit)
  • Employees:4 (moderate benefit)
  • Local Community: 5 (high benefit)
  • Shareholders: 2 (low benefit)

These examples illustrate how the “Cui Bono” approach can help analyze the benefits and motivations of different stakeholders in various leadership contexts.