Cui Bono : Scoring Benefits of Key Categories

Below are examples applying the “Cui Bono” assessment for each leadership category, complete with hypothetical scenarios, identified actors, motivations, and benefit scores.

1. Business Leadership

Scenario: A company decides to automate its manufacturing process.

Identified Actors:

  • Shareholders
  • Employees
  • Customers
  • Management

Motivations:

  • Shareholders: Increased profits due to lower labor costs.
  • Employees: Job loss or job reassignment.
  • Customers: Potential lower prices due to cost savings.
  • Management: Streamlined operations and improved efficiency.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Shareholders: 5 (high benefit)
  • Employees:1 (low benefit)
  • Customers: 4 (moderate benefit)
  • Management: 4 (moderate benefit)

2. Career Leadership

Scenario: An individual seeks additional certification for career advancement.

Identified Actors:

  • The Individual
  • Employer
  • Colleagues
  • Certification Body

Motivations:

  • The Individual: Improved skills and career prospects.
  • Employer: More skilled workforce; potential employee retention.
  • Colleagues: Possible increased competition for promotions.
  • Certification Body: Financial gain from course fees.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • The Individual: 5 (high benefit)
  • Employer:4 (moderate benefit)
  • Colleagues:2 (low benefit)
  • Certification Body:5 (high benefit)

3. AI Leadership

Scenario: A tech company releases an AI-driven analytics tool.

Identified Actors:

  • Developers
  • Clients using the tool
  • Competitors
  • Regulators

Motivations:

  • Developers: Career advancement and financial gain.
  • Clients: Improved decision-making and efficiency.
  • Competitors: Need to adapt or lose market share.
  • Regulators: Ensuring compliance with standards.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Developers: 5 (high benefit)
  • Clients:4 (high benefit)
  • Competitors:2 (low benefit)
  • Regulators:3 (moderate benefit)

4. Innovation Leadership

Scenario: A startup develops a groundbreaking renewable energy technology.

Identified Actors:

  • Investors
  • Consumers
  • Competitors in the energy market
  • Environmental NGOs

Motivations:

  • Investors: Return on investment from a successful product.
  • Consumers: Access to cleaner energy and potential cost savings.
  • Competitors: Increased pressure to innovate.
  • Environmental NGOs: Achievement of sustainability goals.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Investors: 4 (high benefit)
  • Consumers:5 (high benefit)
  • Competitors:2 (low benefit)
  • Environmental NGOs:4 (high benefit)

5. Political Leadership

Scenario: A government proposes new tax incentives for electric vehicles.

Identified Actors:

  • Auto manufacturers
  • Consumers
  • Environmental activists
  • Taxpayers

Motivations:

  • Auto manufacturers: Increased sales of electric vehicles.
  • Consumers: Financial benefits from tax incentives.
  • Environmental activists: Reduced carbon emissions.
  • Taxpayers: Concerns about government spending and priorities.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Auto manufacturers:5 (high benefit)
  • Consumers: 4 (high benefit)
  • Environmental activists: 5 (high benefit)
  • Taxpayers:2 (low benefit)

6. Health Care Leadership

Scenario: A hospital implements a new electronic health records (EHR) system.

Identified Actors:

  • Patients
  • Healthcare providers
  • Insurance companies
  • EHR vendors

Motivations:

  • Patients: Improved access to their medical records.
  • Healthcare providers: Enhanced efficiency and better patient care.
  • Insurance companies: Streamlined claims processing.
  • EHR vendors: Profit from software sales and ongoing support.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Patients: 4 (high benefit)
  • Healthcare providers:5 (high benefit)
  • Insurance companies: 4 (high benefit)
  • EHR vendors: 5 (high benefit)

7. Sustainability Leadership

Scenario: A corporation commits to a zero-waste policy.

Identified Actors:

  • Company Executives
  • Employees
  • Local Community
  • Shareholders

Motivations:

  • Company Executives: Enhancing corporate image and leadership.
  • Employees: Job security and morale from sustainable practices.
  • Local Community: Environmental benefits and potential job creation.
  • Shareholders: Concerns about potential costs associated with sustainability.

Benefit Scores (1-5):

  • Company Executives: 5 (high benefit)
  • Employees:4 (moderate benefit)
  • Local Community: 5 (high benefit)
  • Shareholders: 2 (low benefit)

These examples illustrate how the “Cui Bono” approach can help analyze the benefits and motivations of different stakeholders in various leadership contexts.

Sharing is Caring! Thanks!